Chapter 1  ·  Module 6

Rational Prescribing and Drug Information

Section 1

The Five Elements of Rational Prescribing

1

Right Drug

Evidence-based selection for this specific indication

2

Right Dose

Individualized by weight, organ function, age, genetics

3

Right Route

Matched to urgency and bioavailability

4

Right Duration

Defined endpoint; not open-ended

5

Right Patient

Contraindications, interactions, and adherence all assessed

Therapeutic drug monitoring is indicated when: a drug has a narrow therapeutic index AND significant interpatient pharmacokinetic variability AND a well-established concentration-effect relationship. Classic examples: aminoglycosides, vancomycin, digoxin, lithium, phenytoin, cyclosporine, tacrolimus.

Section 2

High-Yield Teratogens

Drug Fetal Risk Clinical Action
Isotretinoin Severe craniofacial, cardiac, central nervous system malformations Absolutely contraindicated. Mandatory iPLEDGE program required.
Warfarin Embryopathy (1st trimester); fetal bleeding (later) Switch to heparin (does not cross placenta).
Valproic acid Neural tube defects, cognitive impairment, autism spectrum disorder Highest-risk antiepileptic. Avoid if alternatives exist.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors / angiotensin receptor blockers Fetal renal dysgenesis, oligohydramnios (2nd and 3rd trimester) Switch to methyldopa, labetalol, or nifedipine.
Methotrexate Fetal death, limb and central nervous system malformations Contraindicated. Washout required before conception.
Tetracyclines Fetal tooth and bone dysplasia Avoid after week 14. Use safe alternatives.

Section 3 — Evidence Appraisal

Absolute vs. Relative Risk Reduction

Same trial — two ways of presenting the result

Drug reduces myocardial infarction: placebo group 4% event rate → treated group 2% event rate

50%

Relative Risk Reduction

What marketing uses. Sounds impressive.

2%

Absolute Risk Reduction

Actual probability of benefit per patient treated.

50

Number Needed to Treat

49 of 50 receive no benefit; all 50 bear risks and cost.

Always ask for the absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat. The relative risk reduction alone cannot tell you whether the absolute benefit is clinically meaningful. Low baseline event rates produce small absolute benefits even with impressive relative reductions.

Hierarchy of Evidence (highest to lowest)

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
Individual well-conducted randomized controlled trials
Cohort studies  ·  Case-control studies
Case series  ·  Expert opinion (lowest quality)

Section 4

Medication Errors and Prevention

Prescribing

Most common category

Wrong drug, dose, route, or omission of indicated drug. Decimal place errors, weight-based calculation errors, look-alike/sound-alike name errors (hydroxyzine vs. hydralazine; vinblastine vs. vincristine).

Dispensing

Pharmacy stage

Wrong drug selected, wrong strength, misread handwriting. Substantially reduced by electronic prescribing.

Administration

Point of patient care

Wrong patient, wrong time, wrong rate. Barcode administration systems and independent double-checks for high-risk drugs (insulin, anticoagulants) reduce risk.

Monitoring

Failure to track response or toxicity

Missing drug levels for narrow therapeutic index drugs, not checking renal function after starting nephrotoxic agents, missing early toxicity signals.

Individual Prescriber Safety Habits

Never abbreviate drug names  ·  Always specify complete route and frequency  ·  Double-check unusually high or low doses  ·  Verify weight-based calculations independently  ·  Confirm renal function before prescribing renally cleared drugs  ·  Review the complete medication list for interactions before adding any new drug