Chapter 13 · Module 4
Buprenorphine, mixed agonist-antagonists, naloxone, and naltrexone compared
Four Drug Classes Compared
| Class | Examples | Mu Activity | Ceiling Effect | Abuse Potential | Precipitates Withdrawal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full mu agonists | Morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, methadone | Full agonist | None | High | No |
| Partial mu agonist | Buprenorphine | Partial agonist | Yes (respiratory depression) | Lower | Yes — high affinity displaces full agonists |
| Mixed agonist-antagonists | Nalbuphine, butorphanol, pentazocine | Antagonist or weak partial agonist | Yes | Lower | Yes — displaces mu agonists |
| Pure antagonists | Naloxone, naltrexone | Antagonist (no activation) | N/A (no agonist effect) | None | Yes — abrupt displacement of agonists |
Buprenorphine: Key Properties
Mechanism
Receptor Profile
Advantage
Ceiling Effect
Critical Risk
Precipitated Withdrawal
Pure Antagonists: Naloxone vs Naltrexone
Acute Use
Naloxone
Long-Term Use
Naltrexone
Suboxone Rationale: Why Naloxone Is Added to Buprenorphine
When buprenorphine/naloxone is taken sublingually as prescribed, naloxone is poorly absorbed and does not interfere with buprenorphine's therapeutic effect. If the tablet is crushed and injected, naloxone becomes fully bioavailable and precipitates immediate withdrawal in any opioid-dependent individual. This formulation strategy substantially reduces diversion and injection misuse.