Medical Pharmacology Chapter 35  Antibacterial Drugs

Section Table of Contents

Site Table of Contents

Previous Page

Next Page

    • Cefazolin Introduction

      • Cefazolin stands as a classical first-generation cephalosporin antibiotic that has maintained its clinical prominence since its synthesis in 1967, and is considered a foundational drug in contemporary infectious disease therapy and perioperative prophylaxis.2

    • Cefazolin Mechanism of Action and Bacteriocidal Activity

      • Cefazolin exerts its antimicrobial effect through a well-characterized mechanism of bacterial cell wall inhibition.3,4  

        • Similar to all beta-lactam antibiotics, cefazolin possesses a four-membered beta-lactam ring structure that enables it to function as a structural analog of the D-alanine-D-alanine motif present in bacterial peptidoglycans.

          • The drug binds covalently to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), which are bacterial transpeptidases responsible for catalyzing the formation of isopeptide cross-linkages between peptidoglycan strands, the terminal step in bacterial cell wall synthesis.

          • By inhibiting this critical transpeptidation reaction, cefazolin prevents the cross-linking of peptidoglycan polymers, resulting in structural instability and weakness of the bacterial cell wall.

            • This destabilization triggers autolytic degradation of the cell wall, as bacteria continuously remodel their peptidoglycan matrix during growth and cell division.

            • The consequence is bacterial cell lysis and death, making cefazolin bactericidal rather than merely bacteriostatic.

              • Cefazolin demonstrates superior in vitro bactericidal activity compared to other first-generation cephalosporins such as cephalexin, with particularly enhanced potency against gram-negative organisms such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, where it demonstrates two to eightfold greater activity.2,5

      • Cefazolin Spectrum of Activity

        • The spectrum of activity of cefazolin encompasses primarily gram-positive organisms, particularly streptococci species and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), resulting in its efficacy against the most common pathogens encountered in skin and soft tissue, bone and joint, and urinary tract infections.6,7,8  

        • The drug also demonstrates moderate but clinically useful activity against select gram-negative organisms including E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis.

          • Cefazolin is ineffective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which possess the mecA gene encoding penicillin-binding protein 2A (PBP2A), a low-affinity PBP that does not effectively bind beta-lactam antibiotics.

            • Cefazolin lacks activity against enterococci, anaerobic organisms, and most Enterobacteriaceae that produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases.

      • Cefazolin Pharmacokinetics and Distribution9,10 

        • Cefazolin is administered exclusively via parenteral routes, intravenously or intramuscularly, given its limited gastrointestinal bioavailability.

          • Oral administration does not reliably result in therapeutic levels.

          • Cefazolin following intravenous administration is rapidly distributed.

            •  Distribution half-life Is about 4 minutes.

              • Peak plasma concentrations are achieved rapidly following bolus injection, providing immediate bactericidal activity at tissue sites.

              • Volume of distribution is approximately 0.2 to 0.25 liters per kilogram, indicating confined distribution consistent with a hydrophilic molecule that does not extensively penetrate lipid-rich compartments.

        • An important pharmacokinetic property of cefazolin is its high degree of protein binding in serum, which approaches 80 percent.9,11 

          • This extent protein binding has critical implications for pharmacodynamic efficacy as only the unbound drug fraction possesses antimicrobial activity.

            • Protein binding of cefazolin demonstrates concentration-dependent characteristics as higher drug concentrations result in relatively decreased protein binding which may lead to higher unbound drug fractions at elevated doses.

              • In interstitial fluid accumulating within tissue-embedded spaces, approximately 30% of cefazolin remains protein-bound, compared to 80% in serum, resulting in significantly higher free drug concentrations at tissue sites.

        • Elimination of cefazolin occurs primarily through renal excretion, with the drug being cleared predominantly by glomerular filtration, supplemented by active tubular secretion.10,12,13

          • Serum elimination half-life in patients with normal renal function is approximately 1.5 to 2 hours, though more recent population pharmacokinetic studies suggest a terminal half-life of approximately 57.93 minutes.

            •  In anephric patients (those without renal function), the serum half-life extends dramatically to approximately 42 hours.

          • Total elimination constant and renal clearance of cefazolin vary linearly with creatinine clearance, indicating that as renal function declines, drug accumulation becomes proportionally significant.12,14

          • More than 90 percent of an administered dose is recovered in the urine of patients with normal renal function during the first 24 hours.

            • Peak urine levels range from 60 to over 2,000 micrograms per milliliter, reflecting the renal concentration process.

        • Cefazolin is not significantly metabolized by hepatic enzymes.15

        • Cefazolin does not cross the blood-brain barrier to a clinically useful extent under normal circumstances, with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration being limited in the absence of meningeal inflammation.16

        • Tissue Penetration and Compartment-Specific Pharmacokinetics

          • Cefazolin is especially important in perioperative prophylaxis.8,17,18  

            • Bone tissue achieves particularly high concentrations of cefazolin, with peak bone concentrations occurring approximately 40 minutes after parenteral administration, with a bone tissue half-life of approximately 42 minutes compared to the serum half-life of 108 minutes.

              • Favorable bone penetration reflects the drug's hydrophilicity and its ability to accumulate in mineralized tissue through multiple mechanisms.

                • Recent pharmacokinetic studies indicates that optimal bone and soft tissue concentrations are achieved when cefazolin is administered between 10 and 30 minutes before tourniquet inflation during orthopedic procedures.

                  • Median bone concentration-to-serum concentration ratio is approximately 0.25, with a reported range of 0.06 to 0.41.

                    • In continuous infusion studies of cefazolin for bone and joint infections, median bone concentrations reached 13.5 micrograms per gram, with considerable individual variation.

          • The blood-brain barrier presents a significant limitation to cefazolin distribution in the absence of meningeal inflammation.10  

             

            • Protective barriers of the brain
            • Until recently, cefazolin penetration into cerebrospinal fluid was thought prohibitively low.

              • Contemporary evidence suggests more nuanced penetration patterns.19 

                • Even in the absence of meningeal inflammation, the cerebrospinal fluid distribution ratio of cefazolin may be approximately 3 to 5 percent of serum concentrations, which may nevertheless achieve therapeutic concentrations in certain clinical scenarios.

                  • When meningeal inflammation is present, as occurs during meningitis or ventriculitis, the blood-brain barrier becomes more permeable, and CSF penetration improves substantially, potentially allowing therapeutic concentrations to be achieved.

                    • Despite this finding, cefazolin is typically not considered a first-line agent for bacterial meningitis due to its generally limited CNS penetration, particularly in the prophylaxis or treatment of central nervous system infections in immunocompetent individuals.

                     

            • Cefazolin: Pharmacokinetic Parameters

              Parameter

              Value

              Clinical Implication

              Bioavailability

              Not applicable (parenteral administration)

              Requires IV or IM administration

              Protein Binding

              74%-86%23

              High binding; only free drug is active; drug interacts with albumin levels.

              Half-life (t1/2)

              1.8-2.0 hours22

              Allows q8h dosing

              Volume of Distribution (Vd)

              0.19 L/kg22

              Drug mostly localized to the extracellular domain. Effective for blood/soft tissue infections

              Excretion

              Renal (as unchanged drug)23

              Requires dose adjustment if renal failure present; effective agent for urinary tract infections.

              CSF Penetration

              <4%23

              Contraindicated for treating meningitis

      • Cefazolin Pharmacodynamics and Time-Dependent Antimicrobial Activity

        • Optimal cefazolin utilization depends on its pharmacodynamic profile.20,21  

          • Cephalosporins, including cefazolin, exhibit time-dependent bactericidal activity, meaning that antimicrobial efficacy is determined primarily by the proportion of the dosing interval during which unbound drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) of the target pathogen.

            • Unlike aminoglycosides, which demonstrate concentration-dependent killing, increasing the peak serum concentration of cefazolin beyond four times the minimum inhibitory concentration does not enhance bactericidal activity. Instead, increasing the concentration only results in enhanced adverse effect risk.

          •  This pharmacodynamic principle effects dosing strategy, as extended infusions or continuous infusions of cefazolin may optimize T>MIC and potentially improve clinical outcomes compared to standard bolus administration.21

            • Population pharmacokinetic analyses suggest that continuous infusion of cefazolin is associated with improved target attainment compared to bolus dosing.20

        • In summary, for cephalosporins, maximizing the time above MIC is critical.

          • The goal is typically to maintain free drug levels above the MIC for at least 50-60% of the dosing interval for bactericidal activity.

          • For serious infections (like endocarditis) or in neutropenic hosts, 100% T > MIC is often targeted to limit the likelihood of regrowth.

            • High peaks and 1.8-hour half-life of cefazolin facilitate achieving these targets with q8h dosing for most systemic infections, whereas continuous infusion strategies are sometimes employed for critical cases.22

      • Cefazolin Mechanisms of Resistance

        • Although cefazolin is very useful clinically, bacteria have evolved mechanisms to evade its action.

          • Beta-Lactamase Production

            • The most frequently encountered resistance mechanism in Staphylococci and Gram-negatives is production of beta-lactamases, enzymes that hydrolyze the beta-lactam ring.

          • Staphylococcal Beta-Lactamases (BlaZ) and the Inoculum Effect

            • Most S. aureus strains (>90%) produce penicillinase (BlaZ), rendering them resistant to penicillin.

              • Cefazolin was specifically designed to resist hydrolysis by this enzyme.

                • However, BlaZ exists in different serotypes (A, B, C, D) with varying kinetic properties.

              • The Cefazolin Inoculum Effect (CIE)24

                • A phenomenon known as the Cefazolin Inoculum Effect is observed when the MIC of the drug rises significantly (often >4-fold or crossing the susceptibility breakpoint) when the bacterial inoculum is increased from the standard 105 CFU/mL to a high density of 107  CFU/mL (mimicking deep abscesses or cardiac vegetations). [CFU/mL + Colony Forming Units per milliliter]

                • Mechanism25,26,27

                  • Some MSSA strains produce Type A BlaZ, which has a higher catalytic efficiency for hydrolyzing cefazolin compared to Type C variants.

                    • While cefazolin is generally stable against staphylococcal beta-lactamases at standard densities, the massive amount of Type A enzyme present in a dense infection can degrade the drug locally, potentially leading to therapeutic failure.

                • Prevalence

                  • Type A BlaZ is found in 15%-40% of clinical MSSA isolates.

                • Clinical Relevance

                  • Clinical impact of the CIE remains debatable and appe4ars to be mainly a concern in high-burden infections like endocarditis.

November, 2025

Section Table of Contents

Site Table of Contents

 

Previous Page

Next Page
References
  1. MacDougall C Chapter 58 Cell Envelope Disruptors: In Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (Brunton LL Knollman BC eds) McGraw Hill LLC (2023).

  2. Cefazolin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cefazolin

  3. Manski D Urology Textbook: Clinical Essentials. Cephalosporins: Mechanism of Action, Adverse Effects and Contraindications. https://www.urology-textbook.com/cephalosporins.html

  4. Turner J Muraoka A Bedenbaugh M Childress B Pernot L Wiencek M Peterson Y The Chemical Relationship among Beta-Lactam Antibiotics and Potential Impacts on Her activity and Decomposition. Review Article: Front. Microbiol., 23 March 2022 Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and kept chemotherapy: Volume 13-2022. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.807955/full

  5. Bergeron M Brusch J Barza M Weinstein L Bacteriocidal Activity and Pharmacology of Cefazolin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 October;4(4): 396-401. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC444566/

  6. Maniara B  Cefazolin (Ancef): Uses, Side Effects, and More. Drugs & Medications WebMD https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-18723/ancef-intravenous/details#uses

  7. Smelter A Frei C Smelter D Successful clearance of persistent Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia with high-dose continuous infusion cefazolin. Antibicrobial Chemotherapy | | Case Report 31 March 2025. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/asmcr.00114-24#/

  8. Zeller V Durand F Kitzis M-D Lhotellier L ZizA J-M Mamoudy P Desplaces N Continuous cefazolin infusion to treat bone and joint infections: clinical efficacy, feasibility, safety, and Ziermann bone concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 March;53(3): 883-887. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19075069/

  9. Manley H Bailie G Asher R Eisele G Frye R Pharmacokinetics of intermittent intraperitoneal cefazolin in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 1999 Jan-Feb;19(1): 65-70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10201343/

  10. Novak A Krsak M Kiser T Neumann R Prrado L Molin K Mueller S Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Cefazolin in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Critically Ill Patients. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 December 25;9(2). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8802796/

  11. Waterman N Raff M Scharfenberger L Barnwell P Protein Binding and Concentrations of Cephaloridine and Cefazolin in Serum and Interstitial Fluid of Dogs. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, volume 133, Issue 6, June 1976, Pages 642-647. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-abstract/133/6/642/904754?login=false

  12. Rein M Westervelt F Sande M Pharmacodynamics of cefazolin in the presence of normal and impaired renal function. Antmicrob Agents Chermother. 1973 September;4(3): 366-371. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4758839/

  13. Douglas A Udy A Wallis S Jarrett P Stuart J Lawssig-Smith M Deans R Roberts M Taraporewalla K Jenkins  J Medley  G Lipman J Roberts J Plasma and Tissue Pharmacokinetics of Cefazolin in Patients Undergoing Elective and Semi-elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Open Repair Surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 November;55(11): 5238-5242. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3195052/

  14. Brodwall E Bergan T Orjavik O Kidney transport of cefazolin in normal and impaired renal function. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Volume 3, Issue 6, November 1977, Pages 585-591. https://academic.oup.com/jac/article-abstract/3/6/585/671205?redirectedFrom=PDF

  15. Cefazolin. DrugBank. https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB01327

  16. Can Cefazolin Be Used to Treat CNS Infections? U.S. Pharmacist January 10, 2023. https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/can-cefazolin-be-used-to-treat-cns-infections

  17. Mannarino M Montreuil J Tanzer M Hart Local tissue concentrations of cefazolin during total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Canadian Journal of Surgery August 8, 2023 66 (4) E415-E421. https://www.canjsurg.ca/content/66/4/E415

  18. Norvell M Porter M Ricco M Koonce R Hogan C Basler E Wong M Jerrfes M Cefazolin vs Second-line Antibiotics for Surgical Site Infection Prevention After Total Joint Arthroplasty Among Patients With a Beta-Lactam Allergy. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 10, Issue 6, June 2023. https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/10/6/ofad224/7137405?login=false

  19. Pitcock C Burgess D Olney K Optimizing cefazolin dosing for central nervous system infections: insights from population pharmacokinetics and Monty Carlo simulations. Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Volume 69, Number 7. May 20, 2025. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/aac.01857-24

  20. Bausch S Drager S Charitos-Freagkakis P Egli A Moser S Hinic V Huehl RE Bassetti S Siegemund M Rentsch K Hermann L Schoning V Hammann F Sendi P Osthoff M Targeted Attainment and Population Pharmacokinetics of Cefazolin in Patients with Invasive Staphylococcus aureus Infections: A Prospective Cohort Study. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 September 29;30(10): 928. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11504871/

  21. Marcelin J Paz C PharmTOExamTable: What is the evidence for continuous infusion dosing of cefazolin? March 30, 2020. University of Nebraska Medical Center:  https://blog.unmc.edu/infectious-disease/2020/03/30/pharmtoexamtable-what-is-the-evidence-for-continuous-infusion-dosing-of-cefazolin/

  22. Antosz K Battle S Chang J Scheetz M Al-Hasan Bookstaver P Cefazolin in the Treatment of Central Nervous System Infections: A Narrative Review and Recommendation. https://bookcafe.yuntsg.com/ueditor/jsp/upload/file/20230120/1674182269016016011.pdf

  23. Cefazolin sodium:  https://www.glowm.com/resources/glowm/cd/pages/drugs/c023.html

  24. Lo C Sritharan A Zhang J Li N Zhang C Wantg F Loeb M Bai A Clinical significantly cefazolin inoculum effect in serious MSSA infections: a systematic review. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance volume 6, issue 3, June 2024. https://academic.oup.com/jacamr/article/6/3/dlae069/7665561

  25. Wang S Gilchrist A Loukitcheva A Plotkin B Sigar I Gross A O'Donnell J Pettit N ABuros A O'Driscoll T Rhodes N Bethel C Segreti J Charno-Katsikas A Sign K Scheetz M The prevalence of a Cefazolin Inoculum Effect Associated with blaZ Gene Types among Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Four Major Medical Centers in Chicago. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 July 27;62(8). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6105856/

  26. Carvajal L Rincon S Echeverri A Porras J Rios R Ordenez K Seas C Gomezs-Villegas S Diaz L Arias C Reyes J Novel Insights into the Classification of Staphylococcal beta-Lactamases in Relation to the Cefazolin Inoculum Effect. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy volume 64, number 5. 21 April 2020. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/aac.02511-19

  27. Lee S Park W Lee S Park S Kim S Lee J-M Chang H Kwon K Choe P Kim N Kim H Oh M-D Association between Type A blaZ Kaptein Polymorphism in Cefazolin Inoculum Effect in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 October 21;60(11): 6928-6932. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5075110/

 

This Web-based pharmacology and disease-based integrated teaching site is based on reference materials, that are believed reliable and consistent with standards accepted at the time of development. Possibility of human error and on-going research and development in medical sciences do not allow assurance that the information contained herein is in every respect accurate or complete. Users should confirm the information contained herein with other sources. This site should only be considered as a teaching aid for undergraduate and graduate biomedical education and is intended only as a teaching site. Information contained here should not be used for patient management and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with practicing medical professionals. Users of this website should check the product information sheet included in the package of any drug they plan to administer to be certain that the information contained in this site is accurate and that changes have not been made in the recommended dose or in the contraindications for administration.  Advertisements that appear on this site are not reviewed for content accuracy and it is the responsibility of users of this website to make individual assessments concerning this information.  Medical or other information  thus obtained should not be used as a substitute for consultation with practicing medical or scientific or other professionals.